Finland’s reaction to Russia’s maritime ambitions is a diplomatic success, according to expert News Finn

Finland’s reaction to Russia’s maritime ambitions was a diplomatic success, as evidenced by Russia’s withdrawal from the matter on Wednesday. This is the opinion of Rinna Gulla, assistant professor of global history at the University of Tampere and Russian expert.

– Finland’s foreign policy and diplomatic leadership were successful in the dialogue. Instead of giving a terribly sharp reaction, we discuss the matter and find out about it, says Gulla.

On Thursday, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland informed STT that the Embassy of Finland in Moscow had contacted the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia and sought clarification on the matter. So far, there is no evidence that he spoke to the Russian ambassador in Helsinki.

Instead, Lithuania invited a representative of the Russian embassy for an interview on Wednesday.

Russia: Border change will be “technical”.

Since Tuesday evening, somewhat conflicting information has been shared with the public about Russia’s possible intentions to change its maritime borders against Finland and Lithuania in the Baltic Sea.

For example, late Tuesday and early Wednesday morning Independence of Kiev And Moscow Times He said that Russia was going to unilaterally change the maritime boundaries against Finland and Lithuania in the Baltic Sea. At noon Wednesday, Russian state news agencies Toss And Interfax However, based on military diplomatic evidence, they said Russia has no intention of moving the borders in question.

A document on moving borders published on the Russian administration’s website was also apparently removed.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Wednesday that there was “nothing political” about the maritime boundary issue. Kulla also sees Peskov’s comment as evidence of Russia’s withdrawal on the matter – on the other hand it is clear that border relations are part of foreign policy.

See also  The Helsinki stock market rose on a quiet news day

On Thursday, Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Marija Zakharova said the Defense Ministry’s intention to change Russia’s maritime boundaries in the Baltic Sea was “technical” and not a security policy. Zaharova’s comment was made by a person asked at the press conference Helsing’s Sanomat newspaper.

The situation in the Baltic Sea is tense

According to Gulla, the zupaka from the sea borders speaks of international relations in and around the Baltic Sea.

– Generally, boundaries are negotiated bilaterally. Finland and Norway, for example, often negotiate their own commercial waters, and ensure international waters are left in between, Kulla says.

– Whether it’s provocative or wrong, it shows a rift in the relationship.

Kulla sees the maritime border Zubaka as part of a long series of events: except for Russia, all countries around the Baltic Sea have become NATO members, with questions over the Baltic Sea and Kaliningrad airspace. belongs to Russia, while the war in Ukraine is still going on.

According to Gulla, it is difficult to assess whether this is intentional provocation or confusion or, for example, poor communication or damage.

In terms of timing, news of the maritime boundary intentions coincided with the progress of the Finnish Transitional Act for consideration by Parliament. However, according to Gulla, it is difficult to say whether the case is a reaction to any one issue, as many factors have influenced the background, both in the Baltic Sea environment and in the wider international environment.

On Thursday, news agency PNS and Estonian Public Radio ERR Russian border guards reportedly removed buoys marking the canal from Narvajo in Estonian waters. Kulla does not directly connect the Estonian case to the maritime border issue, but considers it also related to strained relations in the Baltic Sea.

See also  Sydney policewoman hailed as hero after subduing knifeman

The waterway is important to Russia

President Alexander Stubb assessed to STT on Wednesday that Russia’s possible intentions to move the maritime border could be a hybrid move. STT interviewed Stub before Russian news agencies reported that Russia had no intention of moving the maritime boundaries.

The president said on Thursday that there was no new information about Russia’s possible plans to redefine Finland’s maritime borders. Stubb urged the Finns to remain calm.

– We can now see a lot of this kind of hybrid influence, said Stub during his visit to Utsjoki’s Nuorgam.

On the other hand, gold cannot be defined as a matter of hybrid influence. He posits that hybrid influence refers to indirect, partially hidden influence that can occur, for example, through social media.

– However, Gulla says that border relations belong to relations between countries.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *