The fate of the statute of limitations now rests with one party

Ellie Harju

The dispute over the boundary law has progressed to such an extent that it depends on the ruling party, the RKP, to pass the law urgently. A split in the party could pose a danger to the government, writes Iltalehden’s Elli Harju.

Anders Adlercreutz, the leader of the RKP, elected in June, is in a difficult situation. Pictured next to it is former president Anna-Maja Henriksson. Kaisa Vehkalahti

On Thursday, a clear picture emerged that the SDP leadership has aligned its ranks and undecided MPs behind the demarcation law.

According to Iltalehti, six SDP MPs have submitted a written request by the given deadline, ie by Wednesday evening, to break the line of the group and vote against the border law, which will be hastily implemented in the parliament hall on Friday. .

For exceptions, dem delegations must apply for written permission from the leadership of the committee. In addition, representatives must call upon the Speaker of Parliament I cursed and swept away – Applying for a permit has been made as difficult as possible and speaks to the fact that the management of the group has the opportunity to talk to the applicant even at the last minute.

The SDP leadership seems to have agreed with the government, especially the Prime Minister’s Party, that six MPs are the number that can vote in defiance of the Limitation Act. Six counts as the number still to pass the Border Act in an emergency vote.

The issue is dividing the SDP group. First, Democrats are deeply divided over whether the law in its current form is necessary and appropriate. Some even consider the leader Anti Lindeman and Tuppurainen have pledged the SDP’s support for the government’s bill at the expense of trying to stifle critical voices in their own group.

See also  D'Chambeau won his second major when McIlroy made unthinkable mistakes in the deciding moments of the US Open.

Boundary Bill votes in Parliament on Friday look set to be tight.

The border law is an exceptional piece of legislation that needs a five-sixths majority behind it to be passed urgently this election season. Additionally, a referendum is held to ratify legislation, for which a two-thirds majority is sufficient.

In voting, yes and no votes will be taken into account. Some may be absent or absent.

If all representatives are present, there are 33 non-voting members, 200 MPs, but the Speaker does not vote. The Left Alliance and the Green Party have opposed the legislation. The Green Party has 13 representatives and the Left Alliance has 11 representatives.

If eight members of the SDP vote against, 33 will be filled. Now SDP’s tally is only a very safe six.

Uncertainty about who will finally be in the House for the vote, for example, has left many MPs pregnant late and coalition ministers from Washington to Finland for a NATO summit.

The SDP does not seem to be the primary deciding party to pass the Border Act, the so-called Conversion Act, during this election period.

At present, the focus is on the ruling party, the RKP.

Among the ten members of Parliament, RKP Eva Piadet He has announced that he will vote against the motion. Also, the political background of the former minister and leader of the RKP has long been speculated in discussions. Anna-Maja Henriksens position, it is a well-known advocate of the rule of law. He has yet to make his position public.

RKP’s team is yet to announce its team line-up. Chairman Anders Adlergrutz and Chairman of the Parliamentary Committee Otto Andersen On Tuesday, when the executive committee’s report was completed, the committee said more time was needed for deliberations and the position was undecided.

See also  This is why Putin spoke about Finland: "It happened the other way"

In any case, Adlercreutz has long said that RKP representatives are allowed to act according to their own will in voting. In principle, many RKP members would find it very difficult to vote in favor of the law

A RKP committee meeting will be held on Thursday evening where the matter will be discussed further.

If RKP members other than Biaudet vote against, abstain or vote against the law, it could be decisive in terms of the urgency of passing the border law, but also good news in terms of the government’s performance.

The government will not tolerate the RKP repealing a law that is important to other parts of the government. Hence, RKP is no longer likely to take decision-making responsibility. However, it is possible.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *