Where were you when the rule of law collapsed in America?

Decisions of the US Supreme Court have far-reaching consequences. Illustrative image. ZumaWire / MVPHOTOS

Last Monday, the US Supreme Court made a historic decision that granted former President Donald Trump, and therefore all future presidents, substantial immunity from prosecution.

Henceforth, all presidents of the country will enjoy complete immunity from prosecution for their “official acts in office.”

In official parlance, a demon is practically a person who can commit a crime in the future as long as the president of the country has anything to do with his official duties.

In Trump’s case, only conversations with Justice Department officials are considered official duties. Trump’s efforts to pressure his former Vice President, Mike Pence, to overturn the outcome of the Democratic elections ended in the same vein.

The judges, who upheld the ruling, opined that the President should not second-guess his actions for fear of prosecution.

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, on the other hand, argued that the president needed broad immunity in his official actions to protect a “strong and independent executive branch.”

But who will continue to protect the citizens of America from this freed leader?

According to Chief Justice John Roberts, the president needs broad immunity. ZumaWire / MVPHOTOS

A century-old lesson in the trash can

In the United States, as in Finland, the doctrine of the threefold separation of powers, introduced by the French philosopher Montesquieu in 1748, is in use. In it, the executive, legislative and judicial powers of the state are divided among the various organs of the state.

See also  Miina Manninen: This is how thunderstorms blow across Finland

The President of the United States exercises executive power from these, and in theory, Congress, which upholds legislative power, and the Supreme Court, which exercises judicial power, must supervise the President so that the moped does not get out of hand. With the impulse of power.

But it got out of hand.

Two days after the announcement, sentencing in Trump’s money-laundering case was postponed for several months, so the judge Juan is a merchant There will be time to learn about the consequences of the Supreme Court’s judgment in the case.

The defense appealed the adjournment on requests that meetings and communications that took place during Trump’s presidency be used as evidence in the trial.

This joke has nothing to do with Trump’s presidency. The entire accounting offense discussed in the trial takes place before his first season.

Although the decision was characterized as political, it was, in fact, ultimately not a matter of conservatives and liberals fighting over, but the position of the entire presidential institution in the United States.

Former US President John F. Kennedy used powers granted by the Sedition Act in 1963 to remove Alabama Governor George Wallace from the state university’s front doors. AOP

Problem power

Many Finns will surely remember in 2020 when Finland discussed protection from prosecution by members of our country’s parliament.

At the time, the Attorney General asked Parliament for permission to indict Basic Finns’ MP Juha Mäenpää for inciting against the national group. Parliament rejected the request, and at that time it was considered that our country’s decision-makers should receive any kind of prosecution.

See also  Asylum seekers who came through Russia have disappeared from reception centers

However, the US Supreme Court’s decision cannot be compared to the situation in Finland, because the president of the US and the ordinary Finnish member of parliament are light years apart in terms of power rights.

For example, since 1807, the President of the United States has been empowered to use the nation’s armed forces and National Guard forces in special situations, such as to suppress civil unrest, insurrection, or insurrection.

The Sedition Act, in English, has been used 30 times in the country’s history. In recent years, it has been classified as problematic in many cases.

Former Democratic US President John F. In 1963, Kennedy enacted legislation to remove former Alabama Governor George Wallace from the doors of a state university auditorium when he tried to block two African-American students from entering a graduation ceremony.

Kennedy was undeniably on the right track, but if standing at the door of a governor to introduce legislation is enough, how low a threshold can it be used for perverse purposes?

The answer is very little. At this point, the only thing standing in the way of abuse of the law is the incumbent president’s respect for democratic values ​​and norms in power.

The true consequences of the Supreme Court’s decision will be seen the day a president who mentions these values ​​with a glove does something more radical than move a governor from the front door.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor is widely regarded as the “conscience” of the Supreme Court. EPA/AOP

Kingmakers

Liberal Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor said The conservative wing of the company on Monday created a king who is not responsible for the law of the land.

See also  The fate of the statute of limitations now rests with one party

When America’s first president, George Washington, was elected to office in 1789, the nation that had broken free from the rule of the English crown feared the rise of a new monarch.

At the time, the nation’s first vice president, then the nation’s second president, John Adams suggested that the president be called, for example, “His Elect Majesty” or “His Majesty.”

At the time, the title didn’t fit America’s mouth, but 200 years later Adams finally got his wish.

The closest to this is the President of the United States, who, as Adams renders, is called “the Honorable the President of the United States.”

To Adams’ chagrin, the last part of the title is left out:

“And the guardian of its liberty”.

This joke has nothing to do with Trump’s presidency. AOP

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *